The structure that protrudes from the picture creates a balance effect in Matisse's [Pink Nude]

The document tells about [Pink Nude],
“After he finished a painting, the assistant took a picture then washed clean the canvas for the next session .
the same process was repeated 22 times.”

I had thought that this is why Matisse’s [ pink nude] has finished look with a simple manner, as if the lines were traced on a sketch drawn in advance.

But the good balance can not be acquired on blank canvas with no traces even after 22 trials because the balance is largely depending on position

I use the same illust from the second blog about [pink nude].

                                         Matisse [pink nude] and the first version
The black and white photo is the first version.
What is common to the two pictures is that the body parts protrude outside the canvas.
Besides many curves are the same arcs.
Here is  the circle-arc pivot model I made for the same blog.

 

                                            Matisse [pimk nude ] circle-pivot model
The model shows that
A) the main body can be made of five different sized circles.
B) the green circles are fastened at several points (pivots).

When I wrote about [Dance] ２
I found Matisse reached more advanced stage of syntax which I named circle-cross model level.
Forgetting about the document I guess  how to achieve this balancing effect.
To use the unit (a set of circle and the vertical ,horizontal diameter) device, the picture screen must be extended.

    Matisse [Pink Nude] circle-cross model extended outside the frame

It is obvious that thegreen circles are most important structualy.

    Matisse [Pink nude]  same circle-arc framework model

The model shows that the seventeen parts of the smooth body are made of the arcs of the same circle.

The same circle-arc framework technique can be seen in Hokusai’s [Tomegane] and Seurat’s [Cancan].

Masterpieces are no drawn but designed.

The universal technique rediscovered by Modern Artist was not understood grammatically,
which is the reason for the stagnation of the current art world.